Just saw “Skyfall” – the new James Bond movie

I don’t go to theaters to watch movies very often. But this week I decided to treat myself to some flick or other, and then I had to pick one. I don’t know why I chose to see Skyfall, except that I think that Daniel Craig is a pretty good actor. James Bond hasn’t been my favorite mileiu for some time, but there it was coming up in a few minutes, so I went for it.

To cut to the chase, this movie rocks.  You like action?  This movie has action.  In fact, the action is almost nonstop.  The plot actually makes sense, even after I’ve watched it I cannot find any glaring holes in the story.  And Mr. Kiss-Kiss Bang-Bang is definitely kissing and banging.  There are two very lovely Bond girls in this film, and one of them gets killed.  I won’t tell you which one.  But it’s sad when it happens, because it happens  just a moment before the cavalry arrives and saves the day.  Temporarily.  She dies because apparently Bond cannot shoot straight due to an injury he suffers early in the film.

If I were a REAL movie reviewer I would give this film four stars out of four.  I can’t think of a single thing that was wrong with it.  The acting was excellent; the story was believable; and the action was exciting and riveting.

Recommended!

Posted in Movies | Leave a comment

Bad Astronomies and Global Warming Deniers

Not that Phil Plait (the Bad Astronomer) will read this blog, but I am quite annoyed by his use of the term “global warming denier”.  I realize that he didn’t originate the term and he isn’t the only one who uses it, but still.  And I wonder.  Does BA intend to equate those who have doubts about global warming, or doubts about it being caused principally by humans, to those who deny the Holocaust?  Because that is what it sounds like.  And if so, then I must strongly protest.  What is being done here by so speaking is not, in my opinion, good science.

In the conclusion to Phil Plait’s post, entitled “New Study Shows Global Warming Is Rapidly Melting Ice at Both Poles“, the Bad Astronomer states:

“The truth is the globe is warming. The climate is changing. Ice is melting, sea levels are rising, droughts and wildfires are on the rise, and much if not all of this is due to human activities increasing greenhouses gases in our atmosphere. It really is that simple, and it’s long, long since past time we acknowledge that. And that’s just the first step, but given how loud the deniers are, it’s one we still have to take.”

While it does seem that he is correct about the globe warming, when he states that “much if not all of this is due to human activities,” I think it is possible that he might be assuming too much.  And not just him.  There may be a growing consensus that humans are the primary cause of climate change, but I fear that the consensus is being driven less by science and more by polticial correctness.  Why would I believe this?  Because instead of couching the debate as one between two legitimate positions, Plait and others smear those who disagree as “Deniers”.

We may eventually come to the point where anthropogenic climate change is a proven fact.  But there is still room for doubt, and it seems to me that it does not become us, as scientists, to leave civil debate and enter into name-calling.

Posted in Science | Leave a comment

Apparently, the End of the World is Near

I am told that there are a lot of folks who expect the end of the world to occur on December 21, 2012.  And the reason for it?  I guess that date marks the end of the Mayan Long Count calendar, and the folks that are putting stock in this end of the world thing regard the Mayans as authoritative.

My question on this is: why?

Why would anyone think that the Mayans would have any insight into the end of the world?  What is so special about the Mayans?  Good question, and I haven’t seen the answer.

The fact is, the Mayans couldn’t even predict the end of their own civilization, so how can they be relied upon to produce a reliable date for the end of the world?  But as it turns out, the Mayans didn’t “predict” a darned thing!

What is the Long Count Calendar?

I suggest you check out the Wikipedia article on the 2012 Phenomenum,  Apparently the Mayans themselves in some of their inscriptions referenced dates beyond December 21, 2012.  And that date only represents the end of the 13th b’ak’tun.  The day after is the first day of the 14th b’ak’tun.  That is all that is going on here.

Now, if I were completely free of conscience, knowing what I know I could have cashed in on this little freak-show.  But I am just too honest for it.  Or maybe I don’t have enough business sense.

There’s reasons for being prepared for emergencies, don’t get me wrong.  Nobody who has seen the dislocations in the wake of events like the Japanese earthquake and tsunami of 2012 can discount the value of being prepared.  But freaking out about this bogus end-of-the-world hysteria?  No, no.  Let’s not.

Posted in Events, Science | Leave a comment

Well, there we go.

It’s not news that Barack Obama has won a second term.  Now comes the flexibility that he told the Russians about.

Just watch.  Either nothing will happen or way more than you ever thought.  And I predict that at the end of this four years nothing will be the same.

You picked him, people.  Enjoy.

Posted in Miscellaneous | 2 Comments

Dishonorable Disclosures

A little late on this one.  My sis sent me the link, but I missed seeing it until this morning.

Just watch:

Posted in Miscellaneous | Leave a comment

Tuesday! It’s Coming!

This coming Tuesday is The Day!  There’s no doubt that some of us are going to be very surprised and disappointed.  I am pretty sure I will be neither.  This is because I am just about as convinced as I can be that Mitt Romney will be President-Elect before midnight at the end of the day.  And since my dear wife and I have already dropped our ballots off, it’s a “done deal” for us.

But as confident as I am, there is nevertheless a degree of doubt in there.  I do not have perfect prophetic vision, so this must be the case.  But I am surprised that there are some Obama supporters who believe that they do possess this vision.  Amazing.

Take this little gem by Robert Crawford, who tweets as @JurassicPork59, for instance:

Romney’s now desperately calling his campaign a “movement.” As in “movement, bowel.”

This word, “desparately”, suggests that the tweeter thinks that Romney is in some distress over his prospects for election.  I wonder where he gets this?  I’ve listened to a few of Romney’s speeches over the past few days, and he sounds not at all “desparate”.  If anything, he sounds genuinely confident, positive, and upbeat.

I wonder if the tweeter has not heard that over the past week Romney’s numbers have improved all over the place, and that states which were formerly counted as Obama states have now gone over into the “swing” category?  And this being the case, why would Romney be “desparate”?  I think Mr. Crawford is projecting, actually.  You know, “projecting”, as in projecting his own emotional state onto another person, Mitt Romney in this case.

Although Mr. Crawford might have a point, after all.  My own tweet in response to the one above went like this:

@jurassicpork59 tweeted that Romney’s campaign is a “bowell movement”. How appropriate! On Tuesday the nation voids itself of Obama.

Posted in Politics | 2 Comments

Doonesbury Dumps on Mitt’s Missionary Service

In the Doonesbury cartoons for 10/8 and 10/9 we see an Elder Mitt Romney tracting.

Two implications:

  • Mitt is serving as a missionary in order to get out of serving in Vietnam
  • And Mitt despises the poor

And note the foot in the door.  I wonder what bon mots Trudeau will come up with in the days to come.  It looks like the beginning of a complete story arc.

I wonder if a cartoonist could get away with lampooning Obama’s service as a “community organizer”?  Or his service in the Illinois State  Legislature — where he voted “Present” on so many occasions, thus failing to take a stand.

Of course, the Left doesn’t like it that Romney is religious.  Though I notice that they don’t excoriate Obama’s church attendance.

Posted in Faith, Politics | Leave a comment

Live-blogging the Presidential Debate #1 Part 3

This segment is the Role of Government.

Starting with President Obama.

He says that the first responsibility is to defend the country.  But the federal government has a role in supporting the infrastructure.  He used the transcontinental railrod and the National Academy of Science as put forth by President Lincoln as examples.  He went on to claim that Romney doesn’t think we need more teachers, but Romney immediately put the cabosh on that.

Romney agreed with defense as being the first thing, and went on to discourse on the rest of the three Declaration of Independence principles: Life; Liberty; Pursuit of Happiness. 

The moderator asked him about education.  Romney is in favor of school choice, and let the parent and the child decide where their allocated aid should go.  Obama responds that Romney’s tax cuts will hurt the education budget.  They both manage to agree that it would be good to help businesses partner with community colleges.

Obama brings up one of the Obama’s favorite mantras, that is that Romney expects students to borrow money from their parents for their education.  Romney didn’t directly respond to this.  Or indirectly, I guess.  If he did, I missed it.

This has been a very good debate.  I guess I am very impressed with both of them, at least as to their debating skills.

And the moderator got blindsided several times with both Romney and Obama talking over him and not letting him keep control.  It was hilarious!

But a good job of moderating, though.

An excellent job all around.  Who won the debate?  I believe that Romney did.  But Obama seemed to hold his own, to a degree, despite what I recognized as a disdain for the facts.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Live-blogging the Presidential Debate #1 Part 2

They’re digging into Social Security and Medicare now, and both gents don’t want to touch Social Security with a ten foot pole.

Medicare gets some talk, though.

They are not in such huge disagreement in this topic as in the economy.  They are both treading very softly on this whole subject. 

Changing subject to regulations, particularly of banks.  Romney wants a complete overhaul of what Obama has done, and Obama isn’t so keen on it.  Particularly the Dodd-Frank law regarding the regulation of banks, where Romney says that designating five big banks as “too big to fail” with the federal government standing there with a bail and letting smaller banks go to hell in a handbasket was a huge mistake.  Obama had no answer for this.

When it comes to Obamacare, Romney had four major points to hold against it, and one important one was that instead of saving $2,000 on healthcare per year, it is costing people $2,000 more.  Lots of unintended consequences.  Obama doesn’t directly address this, though he repeated his old “if you like your health plan you can keep it”.  Which is incorrect because if your employer doesn’t want to keep his health plan because he thinks you can just get Obamacare coverage, he can just cut it off. 

Maybe I am biased (well, I am), but I have to say that Romney makes much more sense in this than Obama. 

But whatever the two candidates are feeling inside, they are keeping a very positive collegial face in the midst of a what must be a bit of an ordeal for both of them (although Romney seems more eager or at ease).  In short, both of them are looking very Presidential.  And that’s good.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Live-blogging the Presidential Debate #1 Part 1

Well, right off, the two debaters had a friendly-appearing greeting, which was nice.  Unlike Kerry vs Bush where Kerry attempted to make Bush look even smaller in stature than he actually is.

Obama’s opening statement repeated one of the mantra’s he’s been repeating over and over, namely that Romney’s plan is to give taxation preferences to the rich.  Tax cuts to the rich, blah blah blah.  In the face of the fact that Romney has said over and over again that he won’t raise taxes on the middle class, and will reform the tax code to make sure the rich folks do pay some taxes.

Obama also makes some wind/solar energy obligatory nods, where of course none of this has been particularly successful so far.

Both guys are speaking well, so far.

Romney makes the point that the areas of the economy which have improved have improved in spite of Obama’s policies not because of them.

Obama responds about taxes that his policies have provided $3600 of tax relief to the middle class.  Where is it?  I certainly haven’t seen it, and I am definitely middle class.  And here goes with the analysis of insisting that Romney will have to raise middle class taxes in order to pay for his tax cuts.  Whereupon Romney shuts the door on him.  Good.  But Obama insists that what HE has been saying about Romneys’s tax plan is correct, and Romney is wrong.

I think the problem is that Obama’s team only sees that there is a zero-sum game.  The whole idea is that a smaller slice of a larger pie is actually larger than a large slice of a small pie.  If the economy grows, the slice for the government goes UP not down.  And hence pays for the tax cut.  But Obama and his people don’t believe it.

Obama insists on 5 trillion tax cuts, when Romney keeps saying he’s not going to cut 5 trillion.  Talk about broken records.  And now he is talking AGAIN about what happened during Bush’s term, without mentioning Bush directly.

Well, that’s the first 15 minutes.  And some extra.

Posted in Miscellaneous, Politics | Leave a comment